Low-fat and low-carb diets equally effective, Stanford study finds

636548004250816960scalesdietCROP.jpg

21 Feb 2018 --- After years of debate, a new study at the Stanford University School of Medicine has found that neither a low-fat nor a low-carb diet is superior: Cutting either carbs or fats leads to a reduction of excess weight in about the same proportion, according to the study. The study also looked into whether insulin levels or a specific genotype pattern could predict an individual's success on either diet. The answer, in both cases, was no.

“We've all heard stories of a friend who went on one diet – it worked great – and then another friend tried the same diet, and it didn't work at all,” says Christopher Gardner, Ph.D., professor of medicine and the lead author of the study. “It's because we're all very different, and we're just starting to understand the reasons for this diversity. Maybe we shouldn't be asking what's the best diet, but what's the best diet for whom?”

Past research has shown that a range of factors, including genetics, insulin levels and the microbiome, might affect weight loss. The new study, published in JAMA, focused on genetics and insulin, seeking to discover if these nuances of biology would encourage an individual's body to favor a low-carbohydrate diet or a low-fat diet. 

To find out if individual biological factors dictate weight loss, Gardner’s research included 609 participants between the ages of 18 and 50. About half were men and half were women. All were randomized into one of two dietary groups: low-carbohydrate or low-fat. Each group was instructed to maintain their diet for one year. By the end of that year, about 20 percent of participants had dropped out of the study, due to outside circumstances, Gardner notes.

Individuals participated in two pre-study activities, the results of which were later tested as predictors of weight loss. Participants got part of their genome sequenced, allowing scientists to look for specific gene patterns associated with producing proteins that modify carbohydrate or fat metabolism. Then, participants took a baseline insulin test, in which they drank a shot of glucose (think corn syrup) on an empty stomach, and researchers measured their bodies' insulin outputs.

In the initial eight weeks of the study, participants were told to limit their daily carbohydrate or fat intake to just 20 grams, which is about what can be found in 1.5 slices of whole wheat bread or in a generous handful of nuts, respectively. After the second month, Gardner's team instructed the groups to make incremental small adjustments as needed, adding back 5-15 grams of fat or carbs gradually, aiming to reach a balance they believed they could maintain for the rest of their lives. At the end of the 12 months, those on a low-fat diet reported a daily average fat intake of 57 grams; those on low-carb ingested about 132 grams of carbohydrates per day. Those statistics pleased Gardner, given that average fat consumption for the participants before the study started was around 87 grams a day, and average carbohydrate intake was about 247 grams.

What's key, Gardner says, was emphasizing that these were healthy low-fat and low-carb diets: A soda might be low-fat, but it's certainly not healthy. Lard may be low-carb, but an avocado would be healthier. 

“We made sure to tell everybody, regardless of which diet they were on, to go to the farmer's market, and don't buy processed convenience food crap. Also, we advised them to diet in a way that didn't make them feel hungry or deprived – otherwise it's hard to maintain the diet in the long run,” says Gardner.

Over the 12-month period, researchers tracked the progress of participants, logging information about weight, body composition, baseline insulin levels and how many grams of fat or carbohydrate they consumed daily. By the end of the study, individuals in the two groups had lost, on average, 13 pounds. There was still, however, immense weight loss variability among them; some dropped upward of 60 pounds, while others gained close to 15 or 20. But, contrary to the study hypotheses, Gardner found no associations between the genotype pattern or baseline insulin levels and a propensity to succeed on either diet.

Gardner and his team are continuing to delve into their databanks, now asking if the microbiome, epigenetics or a different gene expression pattern can clue them in to why there's such drastic variability between dieting individuals.

Perhaps the biggest takeaway from this study, Gardner says, is that the fundamental strategy for losing weight with either a low-fat or a low-carb approach is similar. Eat less sugar, less refined flour and as many vegetables as possible. Go for whole foods, whether that is a wheatberry salad or grass-fed beef. 

The senior authors of the study are Gardner; Abby King, Ph.D., professor of health research and policy and of medicine; Manisha Desai, Ph.D., professor of medicine and of biomedical data science; and John Ioannidis, MD, DSc, professor of medicine.

To contact our editorial team please email us at editorial@cnsmedia.com

RELATED ARTICLES
Homepicture

Pesticide Testing: NSF International updates dietary supplement certification standard

14 Aug 2018 NSF International and the NSF/ANSI 173 Joint ...

Homepicture

Retail merger terminated: Rite Aid and Albertsons call off US$24 billion deal

09 Aug 2018 Albertsons Companies, one of the US’ ...

Homepicture

Raisio looks to Benecol brand growth amid company “renewal”

08 Aug 2018 Raisio is targeting renewed growth for its ...

Homepicture

Slendacor: Endorsement for study design on weight management solution

07 Aug 2018 PLT Health Solutions, Inc. has revealed the ...